By Chance...

One day I went to a certain town. It was by chance that I went to such a town. I don't know the name of the town but I saw something unusual there. I saw a beautiful store, it was so nicely built that it can attract anyone. It had nice carvings and the main thing was that it was completely symmetrical which was the greatest things of construction. Now I was curious to check what was being sold. As I guessed there were lots of customers who came to purchase different items. I thought of buying something. When I went to purchase to my astonishment I saw that nobody was there inside the store. Let alone the manager of the store there were no sales people also! But to my astonishment the store was running smoothly. The items were being sold to the customers and not only that the goods were coming to the store in such a way that the customers need not want to wait, if any item is out of stock. As soon as any need arises the good were bought into the store for sale. Thats not all, I did not see a trace of thing by which anyone can go inside and rob the whole store. The security system was so tight that nobody could rob anything from that store. It was safe from burglars and thieves without the supervision of any security staff! Could you believe it?
Do you believe it?
So I got confused and ran away from there. On my way I found one factory. It was large, beautifully built. I was imagining how did the engineer built such a nice factory? I went inside it. Nobody was there to stop me. hehe. Then I saw inside that there were fully sophisticated machines. I wondered who made it! Then I saw that the machines were actually running, in the sense it was working. But for my astonishment not a single person was there to operate it! No managers no foremen and no engineers to look after it! Well I thought that someone has started it and has went for a rest. I searched the whole factory but not a single trace of any humans were there. Now I just started to observe the machines. Those machines were such that without any operators it wont work, but they were working by itself. I was amazed and I came outside. There I saw a light lamp. It was made by a glass pole. On the top was a light bulb. There was no connection of any electricity. But the bulb was glowing. It was generating light by itself. How on earth is it possible? Then I broke the pole. The lamp fell down, now there was no connection between the pole and the bulb. But the bulb was still generating light and that too by its own.
Conclusion:
Now after all this observations I concluded that all this happened by itself.
Something happened spontaneously and the whole store came into existence. It came into existence in such a way that there was no need of any salesmen or any managers. There was no need to check the availability of the goods. It came into existence in such a way that if any items are out of stock the goods have to arrive in time. How great it is!
I concluded that the factory which was built so nicely came into existence by its own. All the components of the machines had fitted themselves into place and started to run smoothly, giving out excellent products. There was no need of any managers or operators. Not only that the machines were designed by themselves in such a way that it wont get damaged. What a beauty isn't it? Then about the light? I was still wondering how could that bulb glow by itself. Then after several thinking at the end I came to a conclusion that the bulb came into existence by chance. By chance the whole glass was molded in such a way that it would take the shape of a bulb. Now the bulb by itself made the gaseous substance in itself in such a way that it could generate light. How amazing it is, isn't it?
Now who can be a greater philosopher than me who has concluded all this in such a way that no other greatest philosopher wont be able to convince you in such an easy way. Please spread this to others so that they can come to know that there are certain towns in which all these things happen. I know you will be asking for proofs. When certain people say that the whole existence of mankind and the animals and plants and all the natural things on this Earth and not only that the whole universe which is perfect in itself came into existence by chance then why can't these things come into existence by chance? Anything can happen by chance. Though the probability of such chance is near to zero, but it is not completely zero. Hence proved!!!

I would like to end my story by quoting one of the famous and the most noted physicists Isaac Bashevis Singer. Who said in a conference:

"Scientists discovered a deserted island. The scientists who stepped on the island were very impressed by what they saw there. They were fascinated by the jungles and wild animals. They climbed steep hills and examined their surroundings. They could not find the smallest sign of civilization in the island. Just when they were returning to their ship, they found a brand new watch on the beach. It was working perfectly. This was quite intriguing for the scientists. How did this watch come here? They knew for certain that no one had ever set foot on the island before them. So, there was only one other possibility. This watch, with its well crafted leather belt, glass, battery and other parts, came to this island by chance and settled on the beach. There is no other alternative."

To explain the impossibility of this, Singer ended his story in these words:

"Every watch certainly has a watchmaker."

[ Source: Taskin Tuna, Sonsuz Uzaylar (Eternal Spaces), p. 31 ]

Any comments and suggestions are most welcomed.
To know more about the Existence of God, read this link, The Road to Peace and Salvation, written by Maulana Abul A'la Maududi.
Thanks for patient reading.

---

Be a Fan

Share This

Follow Me:

A Half-Developed Eye Cannot See

The eye is one of the most manifest pieces of evidence that living creatures are created. This exceptional organ is so overwhelmingly complex that it surpasses even the most sophisticated devices in the world.
In order for an eye to see, all of its parts have to co-exist and work in harmony. for instance, if an eye happened to have lost its eyelid, but still had all the other parts such as the cornea, conjunctiva, iris, pupil, eye lenses, retina, choroid, eye muscles, and tear glands, it would still be greatly damaged and soon lose its seeing function. In the same manner, even if all its organelles were present, if the tear production were stopped, the eye would soon dry out and become blind..
‘The chain of coincidences’ posited by so called evolutionists loses all its meaning against the complex structure of the eye. It is not possible to explain the existence of the eye other than as a matter of special creation. The eye has a multi-sectioned complex system and, as discussed above, all of these individual sections had to come into existence at the same time
It is impossible for a half-developed eye to function at ‘half capacity’. In such a circumstance, the act of seeing can by no means take place. An evolutionist scientist admits to this truth:
The common trait of the eyes and the wings is that they can only function if they are fully developed. In other words, a halfway-developed eye cannot see; a bird with half-formed wings cannot fly.(Bilim ve Teknik magazine, vol. 203, p. 25)

Be a Fan

Share This

Follow Me:

Invalidating Miller-Urey's experiment

In The Name of Allah

Hoping that you know about the Miller-Urey's experiment, I will just give some Facts which clearly invalidates the experiment... But please take the pain to read all of them, because I have taken some pain to read them and arrange them so that I can post them here... Thanks in advance for ur patience reading...[:)]

Miller's experiment sought to prove that amino acids could form on their own in primordial earth-like conditions, but it contains inconsistencies in a number of areas.
The FOUR FACTS that invalidate the experiment:
1- By using a mechanism called a "cold trap," Miller isolated the amino acids from the environment as soon as they were formed. Had he not done so, the conditions in the environment in which the amino acids were formed would immediately have destroyed these molecules.

Doubtless, this kind of conscious isolation mechanism did not exist on the primordial earth. Without such a mechanism, even if one amino acid were obtained, it would immediately have been destroyed. The chemist Richard Bliss expresses this contradiction by observing that "Actually, without this trap, the chemical products, would have been destroyed by the energy source."
---Richard B. Bliss, Gary E. Parker, Duane T. Gish, Origin of Life, C.L.P. Publications, 3rd ed., California, 1990, pp. 14-15.
And, sure enough, in his previous experiments, Miller had been unable to make even one single amino acid using the same materials without the cold trap mechanism.

2- The primordial atmosphere that Miller attempted to simulate in his experiment was not realistic. In the 1980s, scientists agreed that nitrogen and carbon dioxide should have been used in this artificial environment instead of methane and ammonia.
So why did Miller insist on these gases? The answer is simple: without ammonia, it was impossible to synthesize any amino acid. Kevin Mc Kean talks about this in an article published in Discover magazine:

Miller and Urey imitated the ancient atmosphere on the Earth with a mixture of methane and ammonia. ...However in the latest studies, it has been understood that the Earth was very hot at those times, and that it was composed of melted nickel and iron. Therefore, the chemical atmosphere of that time should have been formed mostly of nitrogen (N2), carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapour (H2O). However these are not as appropriate as methane and ammonia for the production of organic molecules
---Kevin Mc Kean, Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technology), no. 189, p. 7

The American scientists J. P. Ferris and C. T. Chen repeated Miller's experiment with an atmospheric environment that contained carbon dioxide, hydrogen, nitrogen, and water vapor, and were unable to obtain even a [b]single amino acid molecule[/b]
---J. P. Ferris, C. T. Chen, "Photochemistry of Methane, Nitrogen, and Water Mixture As a Model for the Atmosphere of the Primitive Earth," Journal of American Chemical Society, vol. 97:11, 1975, p. 2964

3- Another important point that invalidates Miller's experiment is that there was enough oxygen to destroy all the amino acids in the atmosphere at the time when they were thought to have been formed. This fact, overlooked by Miller, is revealed by the traces of oxidized iron found in rocks that are estimated to be 3.5 billion years old.
---"New Evidence on Evolution of Early Atmosphere and Life," Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 63, November 1982, pp. 1328-1330

There are other findings showing that the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere at that time was much higher than originally claimed by evolutionists. Studies also show that the amount of ultraviolet radiation to which the earth was then exposed was 10,000 times more than evolutionists' estimates. This intense radiation would unavoidably have freed oxygen by decomposing the water vapor and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

This situation completely negates Miller's experiment, in which oxygen was completely neglected. If oxygen had been used in the experiment, methane would have decomposed into carbon dioxide and water, and ammonia into nitrogen and water. On the other hand, in an environment where there was no oxygen, there would be no ozone layer either; therefore, the amino acids would have immediately been destroyed, since they would have been exposed to the most intense ultraviolet rays without the protection of the ozone layer. In other words, with or without oxygen in the primordial world, the result would have been a deadly environment for the amino acids.

4- At the end of Miller's experiment, many organic acids had also been formed with characteristics detrimental to the structure and function of living things. If the amino acids had not been isolated, and had been left in the same environment with these chemicals, their destruction or transformation into different compounds through chemical reactions would have been unavoidable.

Moreover, Miller's experiment also produced right-handed amino acids. --Richard B. Bliss & Gary E. Parker, Duane T. Gish, Origin of Life, C.L.P. Publications, 3rd ed., California, 1990, p. 16 The existence of these amino acids refuted the theory even within its own terms, because right-handed amino acids cannot function in the composition of living organisms. To conclude, the circumstances in which amino acids were formed in Miller's experiment were not suitable for life. In truth, this medium took the form of an acidic mixture destroying and oxidizing the useful molecules obtained.

All these facts point to one firm truth: Miller's experiment cannot claim to have proved that living things formed by chance under primordial earth-like conditions. The whole experiment is nothing more than a deliberate and controlled laboratory experiment to synthesize amino acids. The amount and types of the gases used in the experiment were ideally determined to allow amino acids to originate. The amount of energy supplied to the system was neither too much nor too little, but arranged precisely to enable the necessary reactions to occur. The experimental apparatus was isolated, so that it would not allow the leaking of any harmful, destructive, or any other kind of elements to hinder the formation of amino acids. No elements, minerals or compounds that were likely to have been present on the primordial earth, but which would have changed the course of the reactions, were included in the experiment. Oxygen, which would have prevented the formation of amino acids because of oxidation, is only one of these destructive elements. Even under such ideal laboratory conditions, it was impossible for the amino acids produced to survive and avoid destruction without the "cold trap" mechanism.

In fact, by his experiment, Miller destroyed evolution's claim that "life emerged as the result of unconscious coincidences." That is because, if the experiment proves anything, it is that amino acids can only be produced in a controlled laboratory environment where all the conditions are specifically designed by conscious intervention.

Today, Miller's experiment is totally disregarded even by the so called evolutionist scientists. In the February 1998 issue of the famous evolutionist science journal Earth, the following statements appear in an article titled "Life's Crucible":

Geologist now think that the primordial atmosphere consisted mainly of carbon dioxide and nitrogen, gases that are less reactive than those used in the 1953 experiment. And even if Miller's atmosphere could have existed, how do you get simple molecules such as amino acids to go through the necessary chemical changes that will convert them into more complicated compounds, or polymers, such as proteins? Miller himself throws up his hands at that part of the puzzle. "It's a problem," he sighs with exasperation. "How do you make polymers? That's not so easy."
----"Life's Crucible," Earth, February 1998, p. 34

As seen, today even Miller himself has accepted that his experiment does not lead to an explanation of the origin of life. In the March 1998 issue of National Geographic, in an article titled "The Emergence of Life on Earth," the following comments appear:

Many scientists now suspect that the early atmosphere was different to what Miller first supposed. They think it consisted of carbon dioxide and nitrogen rather than hydrogen, methane, and ammonia.

That's bad news for chemists. When they try sparking carbon dioxide and nitrogen, they get a paltry amount of organic molecules - the equivalent of dissolving a drop of food coloring in a swimming pool of water. Scientists find it hard to imagine life emerging from such a diluted soup.
----"The Rise of Life on Earth," National Geographic, March 1998, p. 68.

In brief, neither Miller's experiment, nor any other similar one that has been attempted, can answer the question of how life emerged on earth. All of the research that has been done shows that it is impossible for life to emerge by chance, and thus confirms that life is created. The reason evolutionists do not accept this obvious reality is their blind adherence to prejudices that are totally unscientific. Interestingly enough, Harold Urey, who organized the Miller experiment with his student Stanley Miller, made the following confession on this subject:

All of us who study the origin of life find that the more we look into it, the more we feel it is too complex to have evolved anywhere. We all believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just that its complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did
-----W. R. Bird, The Origin of Species Revisited, Thomas Nelson Co., Nashville, 1991, p. 325

Pheeew... Thanks for ur patience reading... And ya if u want the source of info please ask I can give it, and if u want this to be mailed please give ur mail id...

Thanks.. [:)]
Help from HarunYahya

Be a Fan

Share This

Follow Me: